Malcolm Xs Speech The Rhetorical Analysis Of Malcom X

April 3, 1964 Malcolm X gave one of the most iconic speeches of all time. Malcolm gave this speech at the â€Å"Cory Methodist Church† where he spoke out about the politics of voting for African Americans. Malcolm X advised that African Americans should vote, however if prejudice continued and the government continued to prevent blacks from being completely equal that African Americans would have to use more violent tactics. This speech is great for a number of reasons and one of these reasons is Malcolm X’s use of rhetorical devices. The 1960’s were a rough, yet progressive stage in American history. African Americans were finally labeled as equal to white men and women after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed. However, that bill was†¦show more content†¦Theyve become dissatisfied, and all of this has built up frustrations in the black community that makes the black community throughout America today more explosive than all of the atomic bombs the Russians can ever invent. He uses a metaphor as another example of Malcolm X believing black nationalism to be more powerful than any weapon known to this world. The reason he makes this comparison and specifically name drops Russia is because of the arms race between the two at the time. America and Russia alone had enough weaponry to destroy the Earth as we know it entirely. I believe this quote though exposes the obvious difference between Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X. He alludes to the fact that he believes nothing will change unless African Americans get violent. He states that all this frustration has built up so much that it’s ready to be let out and explode at any time. Malcolm believes that the eventual â€Å"explosion† of frustrations will be more dangerous than all the weapons Russia, or America for that matter, could fire. This is part of whats wrong with you- you do too much singing. Today its time to stop singing and start swinging. You cant sing u p on freedom, but you can swing up on some freedom. While I stated prior that the â€Å"racial keg† quote is my all-time favorite from this all-time great speech, this is the quote I find the most interesting. TheShow MoreRelatedMalcolm X : The Rhetorical Analysis Of Malcom Xs Speech968 Words   |  4 Pages In New York City on March 22, 1964, Malcolm X delivered his speech, â€Å"The Ballot or the Bullet.† Malcolm X, a minister of the Nation of Islam, and a revolutionary advocate of nationalism in the black community, imparted this speech with the intent to reach the black population in a time of change. The adept use of ethos, pathos, and logos to build and maintain a compelling argument, brings about a call to action and firmly conveys his ideas within the black community. Within ethos, pathosRead MoreMalcom X And The Civil Rights Movement1105 Words   |  5 PagesFahad Algarni Ms. Kristi Brock ENG 101- College Writing (WC) 15 July 2015 Analysis of Ballot or Bullet On 3rd April 1964, Malcom X addressed the Negro community assembled in Cleveland over the controversial issue of the civil rights movement. â€Å"The Ballot or the Bullet† speech of Malcom X can be considered as a direct response to â€Å"I have a Dream† speech of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Malcom X and Dr. Martin were taking a stand for the true freedom of the same community but with a diagonally opposite

Letter Q Coloring Book - Free Printable Pages

Annotated Bibliography Brand Loyalty from a Multi-Faceted...

Annotated Bibliography Brand Loyalty from a Multi-faceted Perspective ORGA 201 Introduction to Management Section OP51 Max Su (1762788) Instructor: Rob Dean Brand loyalty is the ‘Holy Grail’ to all marketing organizations. Marketing practitioners are consumed by it. They search. They try. They dream. They want to achieve the ultimate in brand loyalty, making it so airtight that no competition can lure their consumers from their brands of products. Unfortunately, there is no one-size-fit-all methodology. Competition is dynamic. There’s no way to accurately anticipate what the creativity of their competitors can bring to the marketplace, which can lead to†¦show more content†¦The authors describe ethical burden as the necessity of company to charge real cost of doing business, ensure quality of products and services and develop strong customer relations. The focus group study with a sample of 50 business professionals contends that by managing ethical burden with continuous advertising, it can lead to creating positive brand image and hence, brand loyalty, that will sustain the brand in the long te rm through repeat buying phenomena. Babur is an Assistant Professor and Principal at ISRA University, Islamabad Campus Pakistan. Naveed is a Senior Research Associate at Riphah International University, Islamabad Pakistan. There are 15 references in this article. The authors use these references to elaborate on concepts relating to marketing in regards to ethical burden, brand image, brand loyalty and, advertising in general. The results of the study indicate that a large portion of the repeat buying behavior is due to unexplained factors across purchasing occasions. The authors state that this study has a 72% of reliability, but did not show the calculation of how the number was derived. The written English is weak and some descriptions are not so clear. Despite this deficiency, this article provides marketing managers with another perspective to sustain brand loyalty. In regards to the 72% reliability, further research can incorporate quantitative methods of research to indentify outliers, which can lead to a more accurate

Case Study Solution and Lecture Notes for Judicial Activism of Mabo

Question: Describe about the main aim of Judicial Activism? Answer: Judicial Activism is based on the concept that the judges, especially of the appellate court, must alter the existing rules or principles which according to them are faulty. This shall require that the judges should be given freedom from the existing high authorities. The main aim of altering is to give importance to the social issues and values rather than giving effect to the legal principles. There is a limitation to the same where a party should not be held liable in case where he has been declared free. This was clearly stated in the case of Trigwells case stating that the land owners are not responsible for taking care of those who use highways and prevent animals to stray on highway. It was ruled that this would not be possible as in this time of such a huge traffic it cannot be managed by land owners and in case this rule was taken away and altered the land owners will have to take insurance against the third party which would be very expensive. Therefore, it was held by majo rity of courts to exercise judicial restraints and not get the law reformed. It is also said that the court should make a new rule keeping in mind the social values, which is a big question of debate. Therefore, it is said that the decisions taken by the court are based on their notions which the judges themselves believe in and hence might not speak mind of many people in the society. This was clearly illustrated in the case of Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 C.L.R. 1, where the values based on which the judges made a decision was not accepted by all. The question was to benefit the decision made to the native people.1 Mabo case brought about a new law into existence. Mabo case decision was highly criticised after the Wik decision in 1996 on native title and pastoral leases. This reason for such criticism was the decision which was against the interest of political, business and other parties. In the Mabo case the court held that the grant of certain pastoral leases did not remove the native title right enjoyed by the applicant to the leased lands. Many people in the industry and government were against the decision. It was stated that the High court had been involved in judicial activism. The Wik Peoples case in 1996 made statutory leases rescinded against the indigenous people. The court had observed that the statutory pastoral lease did not give exclusive possession rights on the leaseholder. In case of any dispute the statutory leases shall rescind against the indigenous people. This was highly criticised and questioned the validity of land in Australia. The court was criticised for its decision and was said to be not socially aware of the needs of people. It was then that the Howard government came out with a 10 point plan. This plan brought about certainty in the land ownership in Australia. It is to be understood that for coming to any conclusion it is very important that a proper negotiation is done to come to a settlement which shall involve compromises. Any case which is against the judicial activism generally is complemented with judicial restraint. Judicial activism is the power of the judges but it has responsibility attached to it. Judiciary is checked for all its decision, by government and public. But this would not mean that the judiciary should be undermined. They should be given enough space to make a decision. Pamela O Connor, The Wik Decision: Judicial Activism or Conventional Ruling? vol. 10, no. 2, 1997, pp. 217-236. Micheal Kurby, Judicial Activitism : Power without responsibility? No, Appropriate activism conforming to duty , (Civil Law, 2005) https://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/files/dmfile/30_2_9.pdf accessed 31 January 2015 Mabo case was such that the values given by judges were not universally accepted. Therefore, we can conclude that the judicial activism should be given less importance in the judicial process. What needs to be considered is that judicial activism should not be given importance and application with retrospective effect as the rights of the party shall be affected in lieu of correcting the law and trying to make it better. The cases which have been settled since long, the judges should not make major changes in them without being certain about the issues and its effect. This would not mean that the judges should not make any reforms but it should not come by judicial activism but by adopting judicial principles. It is rightly stated by words of King HenryV go to the ant, consider her ways and be wise. Harry Gibbs, Judicial activism and judicial restraint: where does the balance lie?, (Civil Law, 2004) www.gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/gtcentre.unsw.edu.../59_HarryGibbs.doc accessed 31 January 2015. Bibliography: Gibbs H, Judicial activism and judicial restraint: where does the balance lie?, (Civil Law, 2004) www.gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/gtcentre.unsw.edu.../59_HarryGibbs.doc accessed 31 January 2015 Williams G , When the umpire takes a stand, (Civil Law, 2011)https://www.theage.com.au/it-pro/when-the-umpire-takes-a-stand-20111111-1nbag.html accessed 31 January 2015 Connor P, The Wik Decision: Judicial Activism or Conventional Ruling? vol. 10, no. 2, 1997, pp. 217-236. Kurby M, Judicial Activitism : Power without responsibility? No, Appropriate activism conforming to duty , (Civil Law, 2005) https://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/files/dmfile/30_2_9.pdf accessed 31 January 2015